An Interdisciplinary Journal
Information for Authors
Download the Contributor Style Guide (PDF) here.
All articles should be submitted as Word attachments to the Editors.
Democratic Theory welcomes submissions under any of the four categories of contributions:
1. Research articles of between 6,000 and 8,000 words in length, inclusive of references
2. Excerpts of interviews of no more than 5,000 words in length, conducted with leading democratic theorists
3. Critical commentaries and debates of no more than 3,000 words in length, relating to pressing contemporary issues or themes raised in previous issues
4. Review essays of between 4,000 and 5,000 words in length, engaging the latest scholarly and popular works in democratic theory
Each submission must be accompanied by an abstract of no more than 150 words, 6 keywords ordered alphabetically, and a biographical sketch indicating each author's institutional affiliation, research interests, and important activities and publications. Clearly note contact details (including e-mail and mailing address) up to the planned date of publication.
The document file must be set at the US letter or A4 paper size standard. The entire submission, including notes and references, should be double-spaced with 1-inch (2.5 cm) margins on all sides. A 12-point standard font such as Times or Times New Roman should be used throughout.
Tables, figures, and corresponding captions should be placed in separate files; only placement indicators should appear in the main text. Figures and photos should be submitted as TIFF (300 dpi) or EPS (800 dpi), black and white, with all fonts embedded. Alternatively, figures may be submitted on glossy camera-ready paper, and photos may be standard photographs (not ink-jet prints).
Democratic Theory is operated through a three-stage review process:
1. All submissions will be read by both Editors. This initial review will assess whether the submission is of sufficient quality and relevance to send out for blind peer review.
2. Should the submission be deemed of sufficient quality and relevance by the Editors, it will then be sent out for formal peer review. At this stage, each submission will be sent to at least two qualified scholars, who will be comprised of members of the Steering Committee, Editorial Board, or external experts should this be required.
3. Once the reviews have been returned, the Editors will then determine whether the submission can be (a) published without corrections; (b) published with minor corrections; (c) revised and resubmitted; or (d) rejected. Submissions that fall into category (b) will be given up to four weeks to finalize revisions. Submissions that fall into category (c) will be given up to eight weeks to finalize revisions. They will then be resubmitted to at least one of the original blind referees and both Editors. A final decision will be made two weeks after this final submission takes place.
Authors published in Democratic Theory (DT) certify that their works are original and their own. The editors certify that all materials, with the possible exception of editorial introductions, book reviews, and some types of commentary, have been subjected to double-blind peer review by qualified scholars in the field. While every effort is made by the publishers and the editorial board to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that the data and opinions appearing in the articles herein are the sole responsibility of the contributor concerned. For a more detailed explanation concerning these qualifications and responsibilities, please see the complete Democratic Theory Ethics Statement.
- Berghahn Books on Facebook
- Berghahn Books on Twitter
- Berghahn Books on Tumblr
- Berghahn Books on Vimeo